Reengineering Care Pathways Through Quantitative Process Analytics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20744124Keywords:
Data-Driven Process Modeling, Clinical Workflow Optimization, Process Mining in Healthcare, Machine Learning for Clinical Operations, Healthcare Throughput Analysis, Discrete-Event Simulation in Medicine, Emergency Department Throughput, Inpatient Discharge Planning, Bottleneck Identification, Patient Flow Optimization, Clinical Decision Support Analytics, Healthcare Operations Management, Hybrid Analytics Methods, Wait Time and Cycle Time Reduction, Evidence-Based Healthcare Process Improvement.Abstract
Clinical motivation, objectives, data-driven approach, methods, findings, and implications are synthesized. Clinical workflows govern patient management in specialty practices, creating a need for technique deployment to improve operational outcomes and resource utilization. Data-Driven Process Modeling uses systematic data analysis to provide rigorous evidence and formal structure to clinical decision-making. ‡Process mining identifies the real recurrence of patient journeys; machine learning models future event occurrences to replicate desirable flows; simulation of mapped processes quantifies throughput, waits, and cycle times; and hybrid methods combine these techniques. Together, they identify bottlenecks and variations affecting performance.
An Emergency Department throughput case shows how analyzed paths reveal long wait times at triage and radiology, together with extended time between physician disposition and patient departure. Measurable improvements result from targeted interventions. In a second application, development of Machine Learning algorithms for segments of an inpatient discharge planning pathway highlights excessive attorney handoffs, leading to simplified processes and faster discharge times. Analysis of quantitative results indicates throughput times, waits, and cycle times are shortened, variance reduced, and changes statistically significant. ‡Qualitative evidence complements numbers by revealing practitioner satisfaction and user acceptance.
References
[1] van der Aalst, W. (2016). Process mining: Data science in action (2nd ed.). Springer.
[2] van der Aalst, W., Adriansyah, A., & van Dongen, B. (2012). Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2(2), 182–192.
[3] Rojas, E., Munoz-Gama, J., Sepúlveda, M., & Capurro, D. (2016). Process mining in healthcare: A literature review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 61, 224–236.
[4] Mans, R. S., Schonenberg, M. H., Song, M., van der Aalst, W., & Bakker, P. J. (2008). Application of process mining in healthcare. Information Systems, 33(4–5), 389–406.
[5] Rebuge, Á., & Ferreira, D. R. (2012). Business process analysis in healthcare environments. Information Systems, 37(2), 99–116.
[6] Augusto, A., Conforti, R., Dumas, M., et al. (2019). Automated discovery of process models from event logs. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(5), 1–43.
[7] Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reijers, H. (2018). Fundamentals of business process management (2nd ed.). Springer.
[8] Becker, J., Rosemann, M., & von Uthmann, C. (2000). Guidelines of business process modeling. Business Process Management, 241–262.
[9] Carayon, P., et al. (2014). Systems engineering approach to patient safety. Applied Ergonomics, 45(1), 14–25.
[10] Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H. (2016). A socio-technical approach to EHR-related safety hazards. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(4), 641–647.
[11] Shickel, B., Tighe, P. J., Bihorac, A., & Rashidi, P. (2018). Deep EHR. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 22(5), 1589–1604.
[12] Rajkomar, A., Hardt, M., Howell, M. D., Corrado, G., & Chin, M. H. (2018). Ensuring fairness in machine learning. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(12), 866–872.
[13] Rajkomar, A., et al. (2018). Scalable and accurate deep learning with EHRs. npj Digital Medicine, 1, 18.
[14] Esteva, A., et al. (2019). A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 24–29.
[15] Jensen, P. B., Jensen, L. J., & Brunak, S. (2012). Mining electronic health records. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13(6), 395–405.
[16] Raghupathi, W., & Raghupathi, V. (2014). Big data analytics in healthcare. Health Information Science and Systems, 2, 3.
[17] Bates, D. W., Cohen, M., Leape, L. L., et al. (2001). Reducing errors using IT. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 8(4), 299–308.
[18] Berwick, D. M., Nolan, T. W., & Whittington, J. (2008). The triple aim. Health Affairs, 27(3), 759–769.
[19] Porter, M. E. (2010). What is value in health care? New England Journal of Medicine, 363(26), 2477–2481.
[20] Navathe, A. S., et al. (2019). Medicare Shared Savings Program and cost outcomes. JAMA, 321(5), 1–11.
[21] Ostrovsky, A., & Barnett, M. L. (2020). Payment reform. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(10), 903–905.
[22] Chua, K.-P., & Conti, R. M. (2020). Value-based payment reforms. JAMA, 323(8), 707–708.
[23] van der Aalst, W. (2013). Business process management: A comprehensive survey. ISRN Software Engineering, 1–37.
[24] Günther, C. W., & van der Aalst, W. (2007). Fuzzy mining. BPM Conference, 328–343.
[25] Bose, R. P., & van der Aalst, W. (2010). Trace clustering. BPM Workshops, 109–120.
[26] Weijters, A., van der Aalst, W., & De Medeiros, A. (2006). Process mining with the Heuristics Miner. Technical Report.
[27] Rozinat, A., & van der Aalst, W. (2008). Conformance checking of processes. Information Systems, 33(1), 64–95.
[28] Conforti, R., et al. (2016). Mining business process deviations. Information Systems, 56, 1–17.
[29] Ferreira, D. R., Zacarias, M., Malheiros, M., & Ferreira, P. (2012). Approaches to process mining in healthcare. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(6), 1–12.
[30] Mans, R., van der Aalst, W., & Vanwersch, R. (2015). Process mining in healthcare. Springer.
[31] Lenz, R., & Reichert, M. (2007). IT support for healthcare processes. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 61(1), 39–58.
[32] Reichert, M., & Weber, B. (2012). Enabling flexibility in process-aware information systems. Springer.
[33] Carayon, P., & Hoonakker, P. (2019). Human factors and usability for health IT. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 28(1), 153–161.
[34] Topol, E. (2019). Deep medicine. Basic Books.
[35] Shortliffe, E. H., & Cimino, J. J. (2021). Biomedical informatics (5th ed.). Springer.
[36] Johnson, A. E. W., et al. (2016). MIMIC-III. Scientific Data, 3, 160035.
[37] Johnson, A. E. W., et al. (2021). MIMIC-IV. Scientific Data, 8, 257.
[38] Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1–58.
[39] Pang, G., Shen, C., Cao, L., & van den Hengel, A. (2021). Deep learning for anomaly detection. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(2), 1–38.
[40] Breunig, M. M., et al. (2000). LOF. SIGMOD, 93–104.
[41] Liu, F. T., et al. (2008). Isolation forest. ICDM, 413–422.
[42] Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2014). Auto-encoding variational Bayes. ICLR.
[43] Goodfellow, I., et al. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. NeurIPS.
[44] Paszke, A., et al. (2019). PyTorch. NeurIPS.
[45] Pedregosa, F., et al. (2011). Scikit-learn. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.
[46] Wu, S., et al. (2020). Deep learning in clinical NLP. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(3), 457–470.
[47] Wehbe, R. M., et al. (2021). Deep learning in clinical NLP. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(2), 1–15.
[48] Savova, G. K., et al. (2010). cTAKES. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(5), 507–513.
[49] Chapman, W. W., et al. (2011). Overcoming barriers to NLP. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(5), 540–543.
[50] Uzuner, O., et al. (2011). i2b2 challenge. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(5), 552–556.
[51] Henry, S., et al. (2020). n2c2 shared task. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(1), 3–12.
[52] Meystre, S. M., et al. (2017). Clinical data reuse. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 26(1), 38–52.
[53] Wilkowska, W., & Ziefle, M. (2012). Privacy and data security in e-health. Health Policy and Technology, 1(3), 119–131.
[54] Abouelmehdi, K., et al. (2018). Big healthcare data security. Journal of Big Data, 5, 1.
[55] Greenhalgh, T., et al. (2017). Beyond adoption. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(11), e367.
[56] OECD. (2020). Health in the 21st century. OECD Publishing.
[57] World Health Organization. (2021). Global strategy on digital health 2020.
[58] European Commission. (2022). European Health Data Space.
[59] Gartner, D. R., et al. (2020). Population health analytics. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 32(4), 934–950.
[60] Bitterman, D. S., et al. (2020). AI in population health. JAMA, 323(6), 517–518.
[61] Chowdhury, A., & Kuo, A. M. H. (2021). Population health analytics. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 115, 103684.
[62] Akidau, T., et al. (2015). The dataflow model. VLDB Endowment, 8(12), 1792–1803.
[63] Kreps, J., et al. (2011). Kafka. NetDB Workshop.
[64] Zaharia, M., et al. (2016). Apache Spark. Communications of the ACM, 59(11), 56–65.
[65] Kleppmann, M. (2017). Designing data-intensive applications. O’Reilly.
[66] Fielding, R. T. (2000). Architectural styles. Doctoral dissertation.
[67] Newman, S. (2015). Building microservices. O’Reilly.
[68] Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). NIST cloud definition.
[69] Benson, T., & Grieve, G. (2021). Principles of health interoperability. Springer.
[70] Mandel, J. C., et al. (2016). SMART on FHIR. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(5), 899–908.
[71] Lehne, M., et al. (2019). The use of FHIR. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 267, 52–58.
[72] Amor, D., et al. (2020). Data governance in healthcare. Health Informatics Journal, 26(2), 1167–1181.
[73] Kuo, A. M. H. (2011). Cloud computing in healthcare. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(3), e67.
[74] Zhang, Y., et al. (2017). Health-CPS. IEEE Systems Journal, 11(1), 88–95.
[75] Chen, M., et al. (2017). Wearable 2.0. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(1), 54–61.
[76] Gubbi, J., et al. (2013). Internet of Things. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660.
[77] Buyya, R., et al. (2010). Cloud computing. Wiley.
[78] Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. (2008). MapReduce. Communications of the ACM, 51(1), 107–113.
[79] Tanenbaum, A. S., & Van Steen, M. (2017). Distributed systems. Pearson.
[80] Bass, L., et al. (2013). Software architecture in practice. Addison-Wesley.
[81] Gamma, E., et al. (1994). Design patterns. Addison-Wesley.
[82] Fowler, M. (2018). Patterns of enterprise application architecture. Addison-Wesley.
[83] Caruana, R., et al. (2015). Intelligible models for healthcare. KDD, 1721–1730.
[84] Molnar, C. (2022). Interpretable machine learning. Lulu.
[85] Ribeiro, M. T., et al. (2016). Explaining predictions. KDD, 1135–1144.
[86] Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). SHAP. NeurIPS.
[87] Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box models. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 206–215.
[88] Ghassemi, M., et al. (2021). The false hope of explainable AI. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(11), e745–e750.
[89] Wiens, J., et al. (2019). Do no harm. Nature Medicine, 25(9), 1337–1340.
[90] Haux, R. (2010). Medical informatics: Past, present, future. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(9), 599–610.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
The American Online Journal of Science and Engineering (AOJSE) is an open-access journal, and all published articles are made freely available to readers worldwide under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license governs the use, sharing, adaptation, and distribution of all content published in AOJSE and is designed to promote the broadest possible dissemination and reuse of scholarly research.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
Under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, any user is free to share, copy, and redistribute the published material in any medium or format, and to adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original authors and source. The license cannot be revoked as long as the terms are followed.
When using or redistributing content published in AOJSE, users must provide proper attribution by citing the original authors' names, the article title, the journal name (AOJSE), the volume and issue number, the year of publication, and the DOI or URL of the article. Users must also indicate if any changes were made to the original work. Attribution must be provided in a reasonable manner but must not suggest that the authors or AOJSE endorse the user or their use of the material.
Author Rights and Copyright Retention
AOJSE respects and upholds the intellectual property rights of all contributing authors. Authors who publish in AOJSE retain full copyright over their work. By submitting a manuscript to AOJSE, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to publish, reproduce, distribute, publicly display, and archive the article in print and electronic formats. This license allows AOJSE to make the article freely accessible to readers globally while ensuring that the authors remain the rightful owners of their work.
Authors are permitted to deposit their published articles in institutional repositories, personal websites, academic networking platforms, and preprint servers, provided that the original publication in AOJSE is acknowledged and properly cited. Authors may also reuse their published content in subsequent works, presentations, teaching materials, and grant applications without requiring prior permission from the journal.
Third-Party Content
Authors are solely responsible for obtaining written permission to reproduce any third-party material, including figures, tables, images, data, or excerpts from other publications, included in their manuscript. Evidence of such permissions must be provided to the editorial office upon request. AOJSE does not assume any responsibility for copyright infringement arising from the unauthorized inclusion of third-party content in published articles.
Permitted Uses
Under the CC BY 4.0 license, the following uses of AOJSE published content are freely permitted without prior written permission from the journal or authors, provided that proper attribution is given. Users may read, download, print, and distribute articles for personal, educational, or research purposes. Researchers may reuse data, figures, and findings for meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and secondary research. Educators may incorporate published articles into course materials, syllabi, and academic presentations. Journalists, policymakers, and practitioners may reference and cite published findings for professional and public interest purposes.
Prohibited Uses
While the CC BY 4.0 license is broad and permissive, users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Users may not misrepresent the original authorship of published content or imply endorsement by the original authors or AOJSE without explicit consent. Plagiarism, data fabrication, and any form of academic misconduct in the reuse of published material are strictly prohibited and are a violation of publication ethics standards.
Institutional and Repository Deposit Policy
AOJSE fully supports self-archiving and green open access. Authors are encouraged to deposit the final published version of their article, also known as the version of record, in institutional repositories, subject repositories, and open-access databases immediately upon publication. There is no embargo period. Authors should always link back to the original article on the AOJSE website and include the full citation and DOI when depositing their work in any repository.
Digital Preservation and Archiving
AOJSE is committed to the long-term digital preservation of all published content to ensure its permanent availability and accessibility. The journal utilizes the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform, which supports internationally recognized digital archiving standards. AOJSE encourages participation in archiving networks such as LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) and CLOCKSS (Controlled LOCKSS) to safeguard published articles against data loss and ensure continued access for future generations of researchers and readers.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in articles published in AOJSE are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position, policy, or views of the journal, its editorial board, or its affiliated organizations. AOJSE makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and integrity of published content but does not accept legal responsibility for any errors, omissions, or claims arising from the use of information published in the journal.
Contact for Licensing Inquiries
For any questions regarding the licensing terms, copyright, or permitted use of content published in AOJSE, please contact the editorial office through the journal website at https://aojse.org. The editorial team will be happy to assist authors, readers, and institutions with any licensing-related queries.
