Cloud-Native AI Model Lifecycle Management

Authors

  • Jens Lehmann Author

Keywords:

Cloud-Native Model Lifecycle Management, Enterprise AI Systems, Cloud-Native AI Architecture, Model Deployment at Scale, AI Model Lifecycle Stages, Evidence-Based AI Engineering, Model Quality Management, Bias and Drift Mitigation, Provenance and Auditability, Observability in AI Systems, Explainable Enterprise AI, Compliance-Aware AI Deployment, High-Volume AI Data Pipelines, Access Control for AI Platforms, Cloud-Native MLOps, Scalable AI Services, Model Governance Frameworks, AI Engineering Productivity, Trustworthy AI Systems, Return on Investment for Enterprise AI.

Abstract

Cloud-Native Model Lifecycle Management for Enterprise AI Systems considers the full lifecycle of AI models at enterprise scale in the context of cloud-native design principles. In cloud-native AI applications, a constellation of services, both stateless and stateful, collaborate to serve large volumes of business transactions. Cloud-native AI continues traditional AI deployment goals but at higher scale, reliability, and performance. Quality Evidence-based Discussion details the architectural considerations for deployment, divides the problem domain into stages, and describes key properties for each stage.

Reciprocal benefits are examined. Cloud-native techniques provide general engineering practice provenance, audit capabilities, and prove essential for maintaining quality and reducing bias and drift. Enterprise-scale AI, in turn, informs cloud-native practice by presenting supporting engineering challenges such as observability, access, and high-volume data. Business stakeholders seek accurate, explainable cloud-native AI solutions applied to factors such as legal compliance or customer churn. Model quality, team productivity, and trust determine business impact and return on investment. Junior AI engineers and developers are empowered by supporting engineering techniques.

References

1. Amou Najafabadi, F., Bogner, J., Gerostathopoulos, I., & Lago, P. (2024). An analysis of MLOps architectures: A systematic mapping study. In M. Galster, P. Scandurra, T. Mikkonen, P. Oliveira Antonino, E. Y. Nakagawa, & E. Navarro (Eds.), Software Architecture: 18th European Conference, ECSA 2024, Proceedings (pp. 69–85). Springer.

2. Amorim, B. F., Corrêa Souza, A. C., Costa, L. M., & Souza, F. C. M. (2023). An investigation of challenges in the machine learning lifecycle and the importance of MLOps: A survey. Anais do Computer on the Beach, 14, 1–8.

3. Krishna AzithTejaGanti, V., Senthilkumar, K. P., Robinson L, T., Karunakaran, S., Pandugula, C., & Khatana, K. (2024, November). Energy-Efficient Real-Time Hybrid Deep Learning Framework for Adaptive Iot Intrusion Detection with Scalable and Dynamic Threat Mitigation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Optimization Techniques in the Field of Engineering (ICOFE-2024).

4. Arora, S., & Rani, R. (2024). A systematic review on detection and adaptation of concept drift in streaming data using machine learning techniques. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

5. Annapareddy, V. N. (2024). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Cloud-Based IT Integrations to Optimize Solar Power Systems and Renewable Energy Management. Machine Learning, and Cloud-Based IT Integrations to Optimize Solar Power Systems and Renewable Energy Management (December 06, 2024).

6. Bandi, V. D. V. K. (2023). Cloud-native model lifecycle management for enterprise AI systems. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 2(12), 78–90.

7. Barrak, A., Eghan, E. E., & Adams, B. (2021). On the co-evolution of ML pipelines and source code—Empirical study of DVC projects. In Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER 2021) (pp. 350–361). IEEE.

8. Sheelam, G. K. (2024). AI-driven spectrum management: Using machine learning and agentic intelligence for dynamic wireless optimization. European Advanced Journal for Emerging Technologies (EAJET), 2(1), 3050-9742.

9. Castro, L. J., Psomopoulos, F., Serrano-Solano, B., Sharma, C., Shiferaw, K. B., Solanki, D., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Lifecycle for FAIR machine learning. Zenodo.

10. Chakraborty, A., Das, S., & Gary, K. (2024). Machine learning operations: A mapping study. In Proceedings of the World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (CSCE 2024).

11. Pandiri, L., Paleti, S., Kaulwar, P. K., Malempati, M., & Singireddy, J. (2023). Transforming financial and insurance ecosystems through intelligent automation, secure digital infrastructure, and advanced risk management strategies. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 29(4), 4777-4793.

12. Duda, S., Hofmann, P., Urbach, N., Völter, F., & Zwickel, A. (2024). The impact of resource allocation on the machine learning lifecycle: Bridging the gap between software engineering and management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66, 203–219.

13. Faubel, L., Woudsma, T., Kloepper, B., Eichelberger, H., Buelow, F., Schmid, K., Ghezeljehmeidan, A. G., Methnani, L., Theodorou, A., & Bång, M. (2024). MLOps for cyberphysical production systems: Challenges and solutions. IEEE Software, 42, 65–73.

14. Davuluri, P. S. L. (2023). AI-Augmented Sanctions Screening: Enhancing Accuracy and Latency in Real Time Compliance Systems. AI-Augmented Sanctions Screening: Enhancing Accuracy and Latency in Real Time Compliance Systems (December 15, 2023).

15. Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86–92.

16. Georgievski, I. (2023). Software development life cycle for engineering AI planning systems. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Technologies (ICSOFT 2023) (pp. 751–760). SciTePress.

17. Herbold, S., & Haar, T. (2022). Smoke testing for machine learning: Simple tests to discover severe bugs. Empirical Software Engineering, 27, Article 45.

18. Sriram, H. K., Challa, S. R., Challa, K., & ADUSUPALLI, B. (2024). Strategic Financial Growth: Strengthening Investment Management. Secure Transactions, and Risk Protection in the Digital Era. Secure Transactions, and Risk Protection in the Digital Era (November 10, 2024).

19. Hinder, F., Vaquet, V., & Hammer, B. (2024). One or two things we know about concept drift—a survey on monitoring in evolving environments. Part A: Detecting concept drift. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 1330257.

20. Hinder, F., Vaquet, V., & Hammer, B. (2024). One or two things we know about concept drift—a survey on monitoring in evolving environments. Part B: Locating and explaining concept drift. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 1330258.

21. Singireddy, S. (2024). The Integration of AI and Machine Learning in Transforming Underwriting and Risk Assessment Across Personal and Commercial Insurance Lines. Journal of Computational Analy-sis and Applications (JoCAAA), 33(08), 3966-3991.

22. Isbell, C., Littman, M. L., & Norvig, P. (2023). Software engineering of machine learning systems. Communications of the ACM, 66(2), 35–37.

23. Kästner, C. (2021). A software engineering perspective on engineering machine learning systems: State of the art and challenges. Journal of Systems and Software, 180, Article 111031.

24. Kreuzberger, D., Kühl, N., & Hirschl, S. (2023). Machine learning operations (MLOps): Overview, definition, and architecture. IEEE Access, 11, 31866–31879.

25. Le Quy, T., Roy, A., Iosifidis, V., Zhang, W., & Ntoutsi, E. (2022). A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learning. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 12(4), e1452.

26. Kolla, S., Meda, R., Balleda, L., & Thimmapuram, C. R. (2024). The utility value of ROX index and modified ROX index in determining the efficiency of HFNC in children admitted with respiratory distress. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 11(6), 775.

27. Lewis, G., & Ozkaya, I. (2021). Software engineering for machine learning: Characterizing and detecting mismatch in machine-learning systems. Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute.

28. Yadav, V. (2024). Predictive Analytics for Preventive Medicine: Analyzing how Predictive Analytics is Utilized for Forecasting Patient Health Trends and Preventive Disease. Progress in Medical Sciences. PMS-1126. Prog Med Sci, 8(4).

29. Li, S., Guo, J., Lou, J.-G., Fan, M., Liu, T., & Zhang, D. (2022). Testing machine learning systems in industry: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP 2022) (pp. 263–272). IEEE/ACM.

30. Singireddy, J. (2024). AI-driven payroll systems: Ensuring compliance and reducing human error. American Data Science Journal for Advanced Computations (ADSJAC) ISSN, 3067-4166.

31. Myllyaho, L. S., Raatikainen, M., Männistö, T., Nurminen, J. K., & Mikkonen, T. (2022). On misbehaviour and fault tolerance in machine learning systems. The Journal of Systems and Software, 183, Article 111096.

32. Ikudabo, A. O., & Kumar, P. (2024). AI-driven risk assessment and management in banking: balancing innovation and security. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(10), 3573-88.

33. Paleyes, A., Urma, R.-G., & Lawrence, N. D. (2022). Challenges in deploying machine learning: A survey of case studies. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(6), 1–29.

34. Pessach, D., & Shmueli, E. (2022). A review on fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(3), Article 51.

35. Riess, M. (2022). Automating model management: A survey on metaheuristics for concept-drift adaptation. Journal of Data, Information and Management, 4, 211–229.

36. Koppolu, H. K. R. (2024). The impact of data engineering on service quality in 5G-enabled cable and media networks. European Advanced Journal for Science & Engineering (EAJSE), 1(1).

37. Shafiq, S., Mashkoor, A., Dorn, C., & Egyed, A. (2021). A literature review of machine learning and software development life cycle stages. IEEE Access, 9, 158701–158716.

38. Suárez-Cetrulo, A. L., Quintana, D., & Cervantes, A. (2023). A survey on machine learning for recurring concept drifting data streams. Expert Systems with Applications, 213, Article 118934.

39. Symeonidis, G., Nerantzis, E., Kazakis, A., & Papakostas, G. A. (2022). MLOps—Definitions, tools and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 12th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC 2022) (pp. 686–693). IEEE.

40. Srinivas Kalisetty, D. A. S. (2024). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Predictive Bid Analysis in Supply Chain Management: A Data-Driven Approach to Optimize Procurement Strategies.

41. Wan, Z., Xia, X., Lo, D., & Murphy, G. C. (2021). How does machine learning change software development practices? IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 47, 1857–1878.

42. Xiang, Q., Zi, L., Cong, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). Concept drift adaptation methods under the deep learning framework: A literature review. Applied Sciences, 13(11), Article 6515.

43. Zhang, J. M., Harman, M., Ma, L., & Liu, Y. (2022). Machine learning testing: Survey, landscapes and horizons. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48(1), 1–36.

44. Barrak, A., Petrillo, F., & Jaafar, F. (2022). Serverless on machine learning: A systematic mapping study. IEEE Access, 10, 99337–99352.

45. Ramanakar Reddy Danda, Z. Y., Mandala, G., & Maguluri, K. K. (2024). Smart Medicine: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Next-Generation Healthcare Innovation.

46. Hinder, F., Vaquet, V., & Hammer, B. (2024). Concept drift detection and adaptation in evolving environments: A survey. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7.

47. Hu, Q., Guo, Y., Xie, X., Cordy, M., Ma, L., Papadakis, M., & Le Traon, Y. (2024). Test optimization in DNN testing: A survey. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 33(4), Article 111.

48. Herbold, S., & Tunkel, S. (2023). Differential testing for machine learning: An analysis for classification algorithms beyond deep learning. Empirical Software Engineering, 28, Article 34.

49. Georgievski, I. (2023). Conceptualising software development lifecycle for engineering AI planning systems. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Conference on AI Engineering—Software Engineering for AI (CAIN 2023) (pp. 99–102). IEEE/ACM.

50. Rajagopal, A., Ayanian, S., Ryu, A. J., Qian, R., Legler, S. R., Peeler, E. A., Issa, M., Coons, T. J., & Kawamoto, K. (2024). Machine learning operations in health care: A scoping review. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health, 2(3), 421–437.

51. Kummari, D. N. (2022). IoT-enabled additive manufacturing: Improving prototyping speed and customization in the automotive sector. Migration Letters, 19(S8), 2084-2104.

52. Mucsányi, B., Kirchhof, M., Nguyen, E., Rubinstein, A., & Oh, S. J. (2023). Trustworthy machine learning. arXiv.

53. Liu, H., Chaudhary, M., & Wang, H. (2023). Towards trustworthy and aligned machine learning: A data-centric survey with causality perspectives. arXiv.

54. Venkatesan, K. B. (2024). End-to-end MLOps for scalable model deployment: Engineering best practices for efficient and reliable machine learning systems. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 72(11), 165–171.

55. Gallardo, S. (2022). Machine learning operations: The challenges of its implementation in Colombia. Revista Sistemas, 165.

56. Duda, S., Hofmann, P., Urbach, N., Völter, F., & Zwickel, A. (2024). Managing resources throughout the machine learning lifecycle: A software engineering and management perspective. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66, 203–219.

57. Amou Najafabadi, F., Bogner, J., Gerostathopoulos, I., & Lago, P. (2024). An analysis of MLOps architectures: A systematic mapping study. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Software Architecture (ECSA 2024) (pp. 69–85). Springer.

58. Suárez-Cetrulo, A. L., Quintana, D., & Cervantes, A. (2023). Machine learning model adaptation under recurring concept drift. Expert Systems with Applications, 213, Article 118934.

59. Xiang, Q., Zi, L., Cong, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). Deep learning approaches for concept drift adaptation in evolving data environments. Applied Sciences, 13(11), Article 6515.

60. Myllyaho, L. S., Raatikainen, M., Männistö, T., Nurminen, J. K., & Mikkonen, T. (2022). Fault tolerance and dependable operation of machine learning systems. The Journal of Systems and Software, 183, Article 111096.

Additional Files

Published

2024-03-21

How to Cite

Cloud-Native AI Model Lifecycle Management. (2024). The American Online Journal of Science and Engineering (AOJSE), 2(01). https://aojse.org/index.php/aojse/article/view/32

Similar Articles

11-20 of 53

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.