Cognitive ERP Self-Optimizing AI for Enterprise Resource Planning

Authors

  • Ganesh Pambala Author

Keywords:

Autonomous AI Systems,AI-Driven Decision Making,Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Optimization,Intelligent Process Automation,Predictive Analytics in ERP,Reinforcement Learning for Business Decisions,Self-Optimizing Enterprise Systems,AI-Based Resource Allocation,Autonomous Business Process Management,Data-Driven Enterprise Decision Systems,Cognitive ERP Platforms,AI-Powered Workflow Optimization,Real-Time Enterprise Analytics,Adaptive Business Intelligence Systems,Machine Learning for ERP Efficiency.

Abstract

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems integrate essential business functions through a centralized database, but cannot respond autonomously to data updates. Optimizing these systems requires frequent, expert-level decisions. Recent advancements in AI—particularly optimization algorithms, reinforcement learning, planning, constraint satisfaction, and learning-to-plan techniques—enable autonomous, data-driven decisions. Such decisions enhance efficiency, adaptability, resilience, and profitability. AI agents can specialize in distinct aspects of ERP decision making and cooperate in planning and orchestration. These developments should reposition ERP systems as a foundation for business processes: decentralized ecosystems with emergent behavior, analogous to the transportation and aviation industries, rather than a monolithic backbone. Demand forecasting drives tailored inventory policies that determine order quantities and reorder points. Production planning incorporates capacity constraints, product sequencing preferences, lead times, resource bottlenecks, and sales forecasts to align supply with demand. Decision-makers expect immediate operational support, so these plans require timely updates based on unplanned events.

Three complementary perspectives are relevant in validating decision systems. Temporal accuracy quantifies how well decisions track changes in the real-world environment. Latency assesses the responsiveness of a decision system from the external environment to end results. Throughput accounts for processing demand across the entire planning horizon. Autonomous decision support offers substantial performance improvements; however, scrutiny of the results is essential. Two important facets of quality control relate to total cost of ownership and return on investment of the independent decision-making system or agent.

References

1. Anguelov, K. (2021). Applications of artificial intelligence for optimization of business processes in enterprise resource planning systems. In 2021 12th National Conference with International Participation (ELECTRONICA) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

2. Aktürk, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in enterprise resource planning systems: A bibliometric study. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 19(2), 69–82.

3. Avula, V. G., Chakka, S. N., & Jabarullah, M. A. K. M. (2022). Architecting intelligent enterprise applications: AI and ML convergence within SAP S/4HANA ecosystem. Well Testing Journal, 31(1), 169–184.

4. Buxmann, P., Hess, T., & Thatcher, J. B. (2021). AI-based information systems. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63, 1–4.

5. Loganathan, R. (2021). Integrated Risk and Compliance Frameworks for Global Data Center Operations: A Governance-Centric Approach. Universal Journal of Computer Sciences and Communications, 1(1), 1-26.

6. Dimov Kerpedzhiev, G., König, U. M., Röglinger, M., & Rosemann, M. (2021). An exploration into future business process management capabilities in view of digitalization: Results from a Delphi study. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63, 83–96.

7. Gozukara, S. S., Tekinerdogan, B., & Catal, C. (2022). Obstacles of on-premise enterprise resource planning systems and solution directions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 62(1), 141–152.

8. Gondaliya, B. (2020). Harnessing advanced GPU accelerated techniques for augmented data analysis and visualization in enterprise resource planning (ERP). International Journal of Professional Studies, 10(1), 67–75.

9. Ivanović, T., & Marić, M. (2021). Application of modern enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in the era of digital transformation. Strategic Management, 26(4), 28–36.

10. Jhurani, J. (2022). Revolutionizing enterprise resource planning: The impact of artificial intelligence on efficiency and decision-making for corporate strategies. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology, 13(2), 156–165.

11. Kratsch, W., Manderscheid, J., Röglinger, M., & Seyfried, J. (2021). Machine learning in business process monitoring: A comparison of deep learning and classical approaches used for outcome prediction. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63, 261–276.

12. Ng, K. K. H., Chen, C.-H., Lee, C. K. M., Jiao, J. R., & Yang, Z.-X. (2021). A systematic literature review on intelligent automation: Aligning concepts from theory, practice, and future perspectives. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 47, 101246.

13. Narne, H. (2022). AI and machine learning in enterprise resource planning: Empowering automation, performance, and insightful analytics. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 9(1), 284–288.

14. Puthuruthy, A., & Marath, B. (2022). Leveraging artificial intelligence for developing future intelligent ERP systems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering.

15. Mattaparthi, R. (2021). Unified Data Lineage and Quality Governance Framework for Multi-Source Sensor Streams in Heavy-Duty Powertrain Manufacturing. Online Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 1(1), 1-15.

16. Sarno, R., Sinaga, F., & Sungkono, K. R. (2020). Anomaly detection in business processes using process mining and fuzzy association rule learning. Journal of Big Data, 7, Article 5.

17. Strang, K. D., & Sun, Z. (2022). ERP staff versus AI recruitment with employment real-time big data. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 21.

18. Thiyagarajan, V. (2021). Machine learning-based integration strategies for Oracle EPM and ERP systems. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 9(1), 13–22.

19. Van Looy, A. (2021). A quantitative and qualitative study of the link between business process management and digital innovation. Information & Management, 58(2), Article 103413.

20. Yathiraju, N. (2022). Investigating the use of an artificial intelligence model in an ERP cloud-based system. International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Computers, 7(2), 1–26.

21. Zhou, J., Tang, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Intelligent manufacturing for the process industry driven by industrial artificial intelligence. Engineering, 7(9), 1224–1230.

22. Agarwal, P., Swarup, D., Prasannakumar, S., Dechu, S., & Gupta, M. (2020). Unsupervised contextual state representation for improved business process models. In Business Process Management Workshops (pp. 142–154). Springer.

23. Weinzierl, S., Zilker, S., Brunk, J., Revoredo, K., Matzner, M., & Becker, J. (2020). XNAP: Making LSTM-based next activity predictions explainable by using LRP. In Business Process Management Workshops (pp. 129–141). Springer.

24. Chakraborti, T., Agarwal, S., Khazaeni, Y., Rizk, Y., & Isahagian, V. (2020). D3BA: A tool for optimizing business processes using non-deterministic planning. In Business Process Management Workshops (pp. 181–193). Springer.

25. Zebec, A., & Indihar Štemberger, M. (2020). Conceptualizing a capability-based view of artificial intelligence adoption in a BPM context. In Business Process Management Workshops (pp. 194–205). Springer.

26. Reddy, V. A. R. (2021). Challenges in Standardizing Member Eligibility Data Across Multi-Payer Healthcare Ecosystems. International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Legal Medicine, 24(3), 1-19.

27. Akgün, D., & Turan, M. (2021). A knowledge-intensive adaptive business process management framework. Information Systems, 95, Article 101639.

28. Gersch, M., & Röglinger, M. (2022). Data-driven business process management-based development of Industry 4.0 solutions. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 36, 117–132.

Additional Files

Published

2023-12-16

How to Cite

Cognitive ERP Self-Optimizing AI for Enterprise Resource Planning. (2023). The American Online Journal of Science and Engineering (AOJSE), 1(01). https://aojse.org/index.php/aojse/article/view/41

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

21-30 of 52

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.