Adaptive ML for Real-Time Vehicle Fault Detection

Authors

  • Pierre Moreau Author

Keywords:

Adaptive Failure Prediction, Vehicle Fault Analytics, Real-Time Predictive Maintenance, Unsupervised Feature Engineering, Active Learning Systems, Data Stream Analytics, Rare Failure Detection, Condition-Based Maintenance, Predictive Maintenance Models, Adaptive Machine Learning, Fault Data Processing, Model Drift Handling, Dynamic Model Retraining, Industrial IoT Analytics, Vehicle Reliability Engineering, Failure Mode Detection, Data Ingestion Pipelines, Autonomous Fault Detection, Maintenance Cost Optimization, AI-Driven Diagnostics.

Abstract

Regulatory frameworks for sanctions compliance require organizations to continuously and promptly screen customers, transactions, business partners, suppliers, and other associated entities. Sanctions lists are dynamic, often containing hundreds of thousands of records that can change without notice. The stakes involved extend beyond direct fraud losses: non-compliance exposes organizations—and potentially their directors and senior officers—to significant regulatory penalties and personal legal liability. This makes real-time sanctions screening not merely advisable, but essential.
For organizations built on cloud-native architectures, conventional approaches—batching data into a data warehouse before applying screening logic—are no longer viable. A cloud-native approach instead demands event-driven processing, embedding screening directly into the real-time flow of data. Additionally, the strict latency and throughput demands of such systems often exceed what purely deterministic rule-based methods can support, creating a strong case for incorporating AI and machine learning techniques to enhance risk detection. This paper outlines key guidelines and design considerations for implementing effective real-time sanctions screening.

References

1. Theissler, A., Pérez-Velázquez, J., Kettelgerdes, M., & Elger, G. (2021). Predictive maintenance enabled by machine learning: Use cases and challenges in the automotive industry. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 215, 107864.

2. Alizadeh, M., Hamilton, M., Jones, P., Ma, J., & Jaradat, R. M. (2021). Vehicle operating state anomaly detection and results virtual reality interpretation. Expert Systems with Applications, 177, 114928.

3. Yandamuri, U. S. (2023). An Intelligent Analytics Framework Combining Big Data and Machine Learning for Business Forecasting. International Journal Of Finance, 36(6), 682-706.

4. Pan, H., Sun, W., Sun, Q., & Gao, H. (2021). Deep learning based data fusion for sensor fault diagnosis and tolerance in autonomous vehicles. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 34, 72.

5. Kaplan, H., Tehrani, K., & Jamshidi, M. (2021). A fault diagnosis design based on deep learning approach for electric vehicle applications. Energies, 14(20), 6599.

6. Jiang, L., Deng, Z., Tang, X., Hu, L., Lin, X., & Hu, X. (2021). Data-driven fault diagnosis and thermal runaway warning for battery packs using real-world vehicle data. Energy, 234, 121266.

7. Mangala, N. (2022). Implementing Databricks Unity Catalog For Centralized Data Governance In Multi-Business-Unitenterprises. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 101-122.

8. Kudelina, K., Vaimann, T., Asad, B., Rassõlkin, A., Kallaste, A., & Demidova, G. (2021). Trends and challenges in intelligent condition monitoring of electrical machines using machine learning. Applied Sciences, 11(6), 2761.

9. Kumar, R., et al. (2021). The importance of feature processing in deep-learning-based condition monitoring of motors. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 9927151.

10. Han, T., Zhang, L., Yin, Z., & Tan, A. C. C. (2021). Rolling bearing fault diagnosis with combined convolutional neural networks and support vector machine. Measurement, 177, 109022.

11. Mattaparthi, R. (2023). Deep Learning-Driven Combustion Anomaly Detection in Diesel Powertrains: A Multi-Sensor Fusion Approach for Real-Time ECM Adaptation. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11, 1084.

12. Buchaiah, S., & Shakya, P. (2021). Bearing fault diagnosis and prognosis using data fusion based feature extraction and feature selection. Measurement, 178, 110506.

13. Leukel, J., González, J., & Riekert, M. (2021). Adoption of machine learning technology for failure prediction in industrial maintenance: A systematic review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 87–96.

14. Gong, C.-S. A., & Su, C.-H. S. (2022). How to implement automotive fault diagnosis using artificial intelligence scheme. Micromachines, 13(9), 1380.

15. Gnanasekaran, S., Jakkamputi, L., Thangamuthu, M., Marikkannan, S. K., Rakkiyannan, J., Thangavelu, K., & Kotha, G. (2022). Condition monitoring of an all-terrain vehicle gear train assembly using deep learning algorithms with vibration signals. Applied Sciences, 12(21), 10917.

16. Kolla, S. H., & Loganathan, R. (2023). Cloud-Native Deep Learning Architectures For Secure Generative AI Deployment In Enterprise Workflow Platforms. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 603-618.

17. Dong, Y., Chen, K., Peng, Y., & Ma, Z. (2022). Comparative study on supervised versus semi-supervised machine learning for anomaly detection of in-vehicle CAN network. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (pp. 2914–2919). IEEE.

18. Syed, S. (2023). Shaping The Future Of Large-Scale Vehicle Manufacturing: Planet 2050 Initiatives And The Role Of Predictive Analytics. Nanotechnology Perceptions, 19(3), 103-116.

19. Gao, D., Lin, X., Zheng, X., & Yang, Q. (2023). Novel semi-supervised fault diagnosis method combining tri-training and deep belief network for charging equipment of electric vehicle. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 23, 1727–1737.

20. Jain, M., Vasdev, D., Pal, K., & Sharma, V. (2022). Systematic literature review on predictive maintenance of vehicles and diagnosis of vehicle's health using machine learning techniques. Computational Intelligence, 38(6), 1990–2008.

21. Fernandes, M., Corchado, J. M., & Marreiros, G. (2022). Machine learning techniques applied to mechanical fault diagnosis and fault prognosis in the context of real industrial manufacturing use-cases: A systematic literature review. Applied Intelligence, 52(12), 14246–14280.

22. Yandamuri, U. S. (2022). Big Data Pipelines for Cross-Domain Decision Support: A Cloud-Centric Approach. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 1(12), 227-237.

23. Li, W., Huang, R., Li, J., Liao, Y., Chen, Z., He, G., Yan, R., & Gryllias, K. (2022). A perspective survey on deep transfer learning for fault diagnosis in industrial scenarios: Theories, applications and challenges. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 167, 108487.

24. Drakaki, M., Karnavas, Y. L., Tziafettas, I. A., Linardos, V., & Tzionas, P. (2022). Machine learning and deep learning based methods toward Industry 4.0 predictive maintenance in induction motors: State of the art survey. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 15(1).

25. Mangalampalli, B. M. (2023). AI-Driven Anomaly Detection in Healthcare Claims Data: A Business Intelligence Perspective. Journal of Rare Cardiovascular Diseases.

26. Raja, H. A., Raval, H., Vaimann, T., Kallaste, A., Rassolkin, A., & Belahcen, A. (2022). Cost-efficient real-time condition monitoring and fault diagnostics system for BLDC motor using IoT and machine learning. In P. Trnka (Ed.), Diagnostika 2022: 2022 International Conference on Diagnostics in Electrical Engineering. IEEE.

27. Yang, K., Zhao, L., & Wang, C. (2022). A new intelligent bearing fault diagnosis model based on triplet network and SVM. Scientific Reports, 12, 5234.

28. Gupta, M., Wadhvani, R., & Rasool, A. (2023). A real-time adaptive model for bearing fault classification and remaining useful life estimation using deep neural network. Knowledge-Based Systems, 259, 110070.

29. Vasan, V., Sridharan, N. V., Sreelatha, A. P., & Vaithiyanathan, S. (2023). Tire condition monitoring using transfer learning-based deep neural network approach. Sensors, 23(4), 2177.

30. Wongchai, A., Aoudni, Y., Yesubabu, M., Reegu, F. A., Gowri, N. V., & Vijayakumar, P. (2023). Sustainable electric vehicles fault detection based on monitoring by deep learning architectures in feature extraction and classification. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 57, 103178.

31. Reddy, V. A. R. (2022). Designing Fault-Tolerant Data Ingestion Pipelines for High-Volume Healthcare Transactions. Frontiers in Health Informatics, 11, 861-889.

32. Kochukrishnan, P., Rameshkumar, K., & Srihari, S. (2023). Piston slap condition monitoring and fault diagnosis using machine learning approach. SAE International Journal of Engines, 16(7), 923–942.

33. Surucu, O., Gadsden, S. A., & Yawney, J. (2023). Condition monitoring using machine learning: A review of theory, applications, and recent advances. Expert Systems with Applications, 221, 119738.

Additional Files

Published

2024-11-12

How to Cite

Adaptive ML for Real-Time Vehicle Fault Detection. (2024). The American Online Journal of Science and Engineering (AOJSE), 2(04). https://aojse.org/index.php/aojse/article/view/55

Similar Articles

1-10 of 53

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.