A Theoretical Model for Carbon-Neutral Concrete Mix Design Considering Diverse Curing Conditions

Authors

  • Hussein K. Khalaf Author
  • Ali Dhafer Abed Author
  • Samer S. Abdulhussein Author
  • Ryan C Rampair Author

Keywords:

Carbon-Neutral Concrete, Sustainable Mix Design, Curing Optimization, Supplementary Cementitious Materials, Embodied Carbon Reduction, Life Cycle Assessment, CO₂ Mineralization, Geopolymer Concrete, Theoretical Modeling, Infrastructure Sustainability.

Abstract

The greening of concrete is a critical research focus in civil engineering, driven by the increasing global demand for aggregates, the worldwide enforcement of decarbonization policies, and the urgent challenge of climate change. As one of the largest energy consumers and CO2 producers, the cement and concrete industry must align structural efficiency with ambitious sustainability targets. This paper develops a conceptual theoretical model within a numerical framework, based on first principles, to analyze the impact of various curing conditions on the environmental-structural performance of carbon-neutral concrete mix designs. The model is built upon three intertwined pillars: (1) an Environmental Pillar focused on reducing Portland cement content via green substitutes like fly ash and slag, using embodied carbon as a key metric; (2) a Mechanical Pillar ensuring engineering performance (strength, durability) through optimized mix proportions; and (3) a Curing Conditions Pillar that accounts for the effects of different curing methods (e.g., wet, steam, CO2) on carbon performance and long-term structural response. This integrated approach allows for the study of complex interactions between environmental, technical, and structural factors. The model provides a foundation for future computational simulations and the development of standardized performance metrics for sustainable construction codes, offering a practical framework for engineers, scholars, and policymakers to advance toward carbon-neutral concrete.

References

1. W. S. N. a. W. V. S. J. H. Arehart, “On the theoretical carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of hempcrete,” J. Clean., Prod., vol. 266, p. 121846: doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121846., 2020.

2. Lebcir, I., Mageswari, S. U., Bhosale, Y. H., Nagubandi, A. R., & Mahabooba, M. M. Agile Strategic Management in the Age of Disruption: Leveraging AI and Data Analytics for Competitive Advantage.

3. W. Ashraf, “Carbonation of cement-based materials: challenges and opportunities,” Constr. Build, Mater., vol. 120, pp. 558–570: doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.080., 2016.

4. A. S. M. Institute, Environmental product declaration: CalPortland Company, Oro Grande Plant, Type I/II/V cement, Type III cement, Plastic cement, Advancement LT, 2017.

5. A. Committee, “Fundamental modeling and experimental investigation of concrete carbonation, Mater. J., vol. 88, 1991. doi: 10.14359, 1863.

6. Kolla, S. H. (2025). Autonomous Agentic Frameworks for Enterprise Service Operations and Intelligent Process Automation. International Journal of Science, Research and Technology, 8(4), 14643-14655.

7. A. C595/C595M-19, Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements, ASTM International, doi: 10.1520/C0595-C0595M-19, 2019.

8. Ç. Ç. S. v. T. A.Ş, Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) Çimsa Super White CEM I 52.5 R White Portland Cement, 2015.

9. F. Collins, Inclusion of carbonation during the life cycle of built and recycled concrete: influence on their carbon footprint,” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 15, pp. 549–556, doi: 10.1007/s11367-010-0191-4., 2010.

10. Davuluri, P. N. (2019). Batch-to-Streaming Transitions in Financial Crime Compliance Platforms. International Journal Of Engineering And Computer Science, 8(12).

11. A. C150/C150M-15, Specification for Portland Cement, doi: 10.1520/C0150-C0150M-15.ASTM International, 2015.

12. C. J. E. a. H. Justnes, CO₂ binding by concrete: A summary of the state of the art and an assessment of the total binding in the Norwegian concrete stock, SINTEF Building and Infrastructure , 2014.

13. K. F. a. B. Lagerblad, Carbonation of indoor concrete: measurements of depths and degrees of carbonation, 2013.

14. C. R. Gagg, Cement and concrete as an engineering material: an historic appraisal and case study analysis,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 40, pp. 114–140, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.02.004, 2014.

15. C. A. P. M. a. M. A. S. I. Galan, Sequestration of CO₂ by concrete carbonation,” Environ. Sci. Technol, vol. 44, pp. 3181–3186, 2010.

16. Y. S. a. S. G. S. Kashef, Mathematical modeling of CO₂ uptake by concrete during accelerated carbonation curing, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.07.020.” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 67, pp. 1–10, 2015.

17. Das, N., Qubeb, S. M. P., Amistapuram, K., & Yadav, R. K. (2025). Artificial Inteligence and Data Science. BR Publications.

18. A. S. T. S. A. a. L. M. I. A. M. Khater, Power generation in white cement plants from waste heat recovery using steam-organic combined Rankine cycle, Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng., vol. 4, p.100157, 2021.

19. Kinetics of Cement: Degree of hydration or Degree of reaction, Cem. Sci., 2022.

20. B. K. a. W. C. P. S. H. Kosmatka, Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, p. 370., 2011.

21. KPC-Europe, Environmental product declaration for kaolinite products—sector EPD, 2021.

22. T. S. L. B. Z. W. a. F. X. P. Li, Calculation method and model of carbon sequestration by urban buildings: an example from Shenyang,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 317, p. 128450, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128450., 2021.

23. P. K. M. a. P. J. M. Monteiro, Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.

24. A. H. a. P. J. M. M. S. A. Miller, Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO₂ emissions from the production of concrete by over 20%,” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 11, p. 074029, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074029., 2016.

25. F. A. B. J. d. B. R. N. I. Monteiro, Statistical analysis of the carbonation coefficient in open air concrete structures,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 29, pp. 263–269, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.028., 2012.

26. M. T. P. F. G. P. J. F. B. P. D. a. V. B.-B. A. Morandeau, Effect of carbonation on the microstructure and moisture properties of cement-based materials, 2011.

27. M. T. a. P. D. A. Morandeau, Investigation of the carbonation mechanism of CH and C–S–H in terms of kinetics, microstructure changes and moisture properties,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 56, pp. 153–170, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.11.015., 2014.

28. A. Nonat, The structure and stoichiometry of C–S–H,” Cem. Concr, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.035.Res., vol. 34, pp. 1521–1528, 2004.

29. Mangalampalli, B. M. Intelligent Data Profiling for Healthcare Data Lakes Using AI-Enhanced Analytics.

30. S. M. J. A. L. a. J. D. B. F. Pacheco Torgal, An overview on concrete carbonation in the context of eco-efficient construction: evaluation, use of SCMs and/or RAC,” Constr. Build. Mater, vol. 36, pp. 141–150, doi: 10.1016/j.conb, 2012.

31. C. G. V. a. M. N. F. V. G. Papadakis, Experimental investigation and mathematical modeling of the concrete carbonation problem,” Chem, doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(91)85060-B.Eng. Sci., vol. 46, pp. 1333–1338, 1991.

32. A. M. S. A. M. a. M. B. M. A. Peter, Competition of several carbonation reactions in concrete: a parametric study,” Cem. Concr, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.09.003. Res., vol. 38, pp. 1385–1393, 2008.

33. Nagabhyru, K. C., & Babu, A. J. Human In The Loop Generative AI: Redefining Collaborative Data Engineering For High Stakes Industries.

34. R. a. Markets, Cement Market Global Growth Forecasts: A $401 Billion Market in 2025, With CAGR of 5.10% Forecast During 2021–2025, GlobeNewswire News Room, Dec. 22, 2021.

35. K. B. P. a. D. O. N. S. K. Roy, Durability of concrete—accelerated carbonation and weathering studies,” Build. Environ, doi: 10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00042-0. vol. 34, pp. 597–606, 1999.

36. A. Y. a. B. A. M. R. M. Saade, Is crushed concrete carbonation significant enough to be considered as a carbon mitigation strategy?,” Environ, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac9490.Res. Lett., vol. 17, p. 104049, 2022.

37. Bandi, V. D. V. K. AI-Based Anomaly Detection Frameworks in Distributed Enterprise Data Systems.

38. B. Š. a. M. Luković, Carbonation of cement paste: understanding, challenges, and opportunities,” Constr. Build. Mater, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.138. vol. 117, pp. 285–301, 2016.

39. F. M. S. B. a. S. M. K. Scrivener, Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3),” Cem. Concr, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.017.Res., vol. 114, pp. 49–56, 2018.

40. K. S. B. B. a. S. B. V. Shah, Changes in microstructure characteristics of cement paste on carbonation,” Cem. Conc, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.016.Res., vol. 109, pp. 184–197, 2018.

41. H. J. A. R. a. Ø. R. C. C. Engelsen, The quantity of CO₂ bound by concrete carbonation in Norway,” in Proc. SCMT4 Conf, doi: 10.18552/2016/SCMT45290.pp. 1023–1030. , 2016.

42. Bhasgi, S. S., Garapati, R. S., & Sasikala, M. (2025, October). Medical Image Fusion of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Using Learned Wavelet Complex Adapter. In 2025 International Conference on Communication, Computer, and Information Technology (IC3IT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

43. E. A. D. K. E. O. F. a. W. V. S. A. Souto-Martinez, A mathematical model for predicting the carbon sequestration potential of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 147, pp. 417–427, 2017.

44. J. H. A. a. W. V. S. A. Souto-Martínez, Cradle-to-gate CO₂e emissions vs. in situ CO₂ sequestration of structural concrete elements,” Energy Build, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.042.vol. 167, pp. 301–311, 2018.

45. M. D. A. T. a. W. W. P. Tennis, State-of-the-art report on use of limestone in cements at levels of up to 15%, 2011.

46. P. D. P. B. G. H. a. N. R. M. Thiery, “Carbonation kinetics of a bed of recycled concrete aggregates: a laboratory study on model materials,” Cem. Concr, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.01.005.Res., vol. 46, pp. 50–65, 2013.

47. Aitha, A. R. (2025). Introduction to Predictive Autonomy. Available at SSRN 5590571.

48. K. V. Balen, Carbonation reaction of lime: kinetics at ambient temperature,” Cem. Concr, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.020.Res., vol. 35, pp. 647–657, 2005.

49. G. V. a. M. Thiery, Gammadensimetry: a method to determine drying and carbonation profiles in concrete,” NDT & E Int., vol. 39, pp. 328–337, doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.10.002., 2006.

50. X. Y. W. a. H. S. Lee, A model for predicting the carbonation depth of concrete containing low-calcium fly ash,” Constr. Build. Mater, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.02.019. vol. 23, pp. 725–733, 2009.

51. S. L. Williams, Use of siliceous and calcareous microalgae to decarbonize cement production, 2022.

Additional Files

Published

2025-11-02

How to Cite

A Theoretical Model for Carbon-Neutral Concrete Mix Design Considering Diverse Curing Conditions. (2025). The American Online Journal of Science and Engineering (AOJSE), 3(04). https://aojse.org/index.php/aojse/article/view/17

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

11-15 of 15

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.