Generative AI and DevOps for Scalable Insurance Fraud Detection
Keywords:
Insurance intelligence; fraud detection; generative modeling; anomaly signal; supervised learning; DevOps; domain-serving architecture; feedback loop; risk; compliance.Abstract
Novel AI applications transform insurance operations from intelligence surveillance to intelligent services, and a core focus is fraud detection. The hypergrowth of generative AI creates new capabilities that enable organizations to shift from mainly reactive to proactive fraud detection. Generative models support the synthesis of fraud-related data signals to augment existing training datasets, thereby enhancing detection performance. Underlying data patterns should be suitable for the generation of realistic synthetic samples. With demographic, health, and police-report data forming the foundation, convincing anomaly signals can be synthesized for insurance fraud. The integration of such signals into the fraud-detection pipeline is supported by DevOps practices, which cover data engineering, continuous integration/continuous delivery, governance, and lifecycle management. The proposed approach is operational in property and casualty, health, and auto insurance.
The generation of data signals aligned with actual fraud has the potential to fill critical training gaps in detection models. The samples introduced through synthesis offer business value not just in detection but also as adversarial test cases and for automated explainability checks. Such comprehensive exploitation can be achieved at scale and overtime without data-ownership friction. The established architecture supports the creation of any form of signal related to any dimension of fraud. Driving connecting veins into the systems of record offers a pragmatic, scalable, and operational approach to doing so. Attention to latency tolerance and data governance ensures that synthesis is feasible, useful, and compliant.
References
1. Gomes, C., Jin, Z., & Yang, H. (2021). Insurance fraud detection with unsupervised deep learning. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 88(3), 591–624.
2. Aslam, F., Hunjra, A. I., Ftiti, Z., Louhichi, W., & Shams, T. (2022). Insurance fraud detection: Evidence from artificial intelligence and machine learning. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101744.
3. Mangalampalli, B. M. Intelligent Data Profiling for Healthcare Data Lakes Using AI-Enhanced Analytics.
4. Banulescu-Radu, D., Cénac, P., & colleagues. (2024). Practical guideline to efficiently detect insurance fraud in the era of machine learning: A household insurance case. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 91(4), 867–913.
5. Lyu, L., Yu, H., & Yang, Q. (2022). Threats to federated learning: A survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 110(5), 750–780.
6. Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., et al. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv Preprint.
7. Yandamuri, U. S. (2023). An Intelligent Analytics Framework Combining Big Data and Machine Learning for Business Forecasting. International Journal Of Finance, 36(6), 682-706.
8. OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. arXiv Preprint.
9. Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., et al. (2023). LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv Preprint.
10. Gottimukkala, V. R. R. (2020). Energy-Efficient Design Patterns for Large-Scale Banking Applications Deployed on AWS Cloud. power, 9(12).
11. Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., et al. (2021). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901.
12. Chowdhery, A., Narang, S., Devlin, J., et al. (2022). PaLM: Scaling language modeling with pathways. arXiv Preprint.
13. Kolla, T., & Kolla, S. K. (2023). FHIR-Based Real-Time Healthcare Analytics using Unsupervised Learning. International Journal of Future Innovative Science and Technology (IJFIST), 6(6), 11751.
14. Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., et al. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 24824–24837.
15. Ziegler, D. M., Stiennon, N., Wu, J., et al. (2022). Fine-tuning language models from human preferences. arXiv Preprint.
16. Peddi, R. K. (2024). AI-Based Workforce Analytics for SLA Governance and Uptime Assurance in Data Centers. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications (JoCAAA), 33(08), 8589-8601.
17. Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., et al. (2021). Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(140), 1–67.
18. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., et al. (2021). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
19. Inala, R. AI-Powered Investment Decision Support Systems: Building Smart Data Products with Embedded Governance Controls.
20. Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2021). Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 2, 429–450.
21. Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., et al. (2021). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
22. Pereira, K., Vinagre, J., Alonso, A. N., Coelho, F., & Carvalho, M. (2022, September). Privacy-preserving machine learning in life insurance risk prediction. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases (pp. 44-52). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
23. Breck, E., Cai, S., Nielsen, E., Salib, M., & Sculley, D. (2021). The ML test score: A rubric for ML production readiness and technical debt reduction. IEEE International Conference on Big Data.
24. Aitha, A. R. (2023). Cloud-Native Big Data AI/ML Framework for Risk Intelligence and Fraud Control in Banking and Insurance Ecosystems. Available at SSRN 6157967.
25. Kreuzberger, D., Kühl, N., & Hirschl, S. (2023). Machine learning operations (MLOps): Overview, definition, and architecture. IEEE Access, 11, 31866–31879.
26. Tamburri, D. A. (2022). Sustainable MLOps: Trends and challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems, 129, 144–157.
27. Mattaparthi, R. (2023). Connected Fleet Intelligence: Edge-Centric Analytics and Computer Vision for Predictive Manufacturing and Asset Resilience. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science & Technology (IJARCST), 6(5), 9077-9088.
28. Zhou, Z. H. (2021). Machine learning for intelligent fraud analytics: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(8), 5891–5924.
29. de Prado, M. L. (2021). Advances in artificial intelligence for financial fraud detection. Journal of Financial Data Science, 3(4), 45–63.
30. Yandamuri, U. S. (2024). AI-Driven Decision Support Systems for Operational Optimization in Hospitality Technology. Metallurgical and Materials Engineering.
31. Debener, J., Heinke, V., & Kriebel, J. (2023). Detecting insurance fraud using supervised and unsupervised machine learning. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 90(3), 743–768.
32. Tumminello, M., Consiglio, A., Vassallo, P., Cesari, R., & Farabullini, F. (2023). Insurance fraud detection: A statistically validated network approach. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 90(2), 381–419.
33. Lu, J., Lin, K., Chen, R., Lin, M., Chen, X., & Lu, P. (2023). Health insurance fraud detection by using an attributed heterogeneous information network with a hierarchical attention mechanism. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23, 62.
34. Nagabhyru, K. C., & Engineer, S. D. (2023). Unifying Data Engineering and Machine Learning Pipelines: An Enterprise Roadmap to Automated Model Deployment.
35. Aslam, F., Hunjra, A. I., Ftiti, Z., Louhichi, W., & Shams, T. (2022). Insurance fraud detection: Evidence from artificial intelligence and machine learning. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101744.
36. Kreuzberger, D., Kühl, N., & Hirschl, S. (2023). Machine learning operations (MLOps): Overview, definition, and architecture. IEEE Access, 11, 31866–31879.
37. Mangalampalli, B. M. Generative AI Applications In Healthcare Data Mart Design And Optimization.
38. Tamburri, D. A. (2022). Sustainable MLOps: Trends and challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems, 129, 144–156.
39. Wazir, S., Kashyap, G. S., & Saxena, P. (2023). MLOps: A review. arXiv Preprint.
40. Fu, M., Pasuksmit, J., & Tantithamthavorn, C. (2024). AI for DevSecOps: A landscape and future opportunities. arXiv Preprint.
41. OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. arXiv Preprint.
42. Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., et al. (2023). LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv Preprint.
43. Kolla, S. K. (2022). Engineering Healthcare Data Infrastructures for Predictive Clinical Analytics and Evidence-Based Decision Making. International Journal of Engineering & Extended Technologies Research (IJEETR), 4(5), 5370-5380. |
44. Jiang, A. Q., Sablayrolles, A., Mensch, A., et al. (2023). Mistral 7B. arXiv Preprint.
45. Bai, J., Bai, S., Chu, Y., et al. (2023). Qwen technical report. arXiv Preprint.
46. Team Gemini. (2024). Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv Preprint.
47. Mangala, N. (2024). Leveraging Microsoft Fabric lakehouse as an AI-ready data platform for enterprise analytics. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management.
48. Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., et al. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 24824–24837.
49. Chowdhery, A., Narang, S., Devlin, J., et al. (2022). PaLM: Scaling language modeling with pathways. arXiv Preprint.
50. Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., et al. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv Preprint.
51. Inala, R. Advancing Group Insurance Solutions Through Ai-Enhanced Technology Architectures And Big Data Insights.
52. Breck, E., Cai, S., Nielsen, E., Salib, M., & Sculley, D. (2021). The ML test score: A rubric for ML production readiness and technical debt reduction. IEEE International Conference on Big Data.
53. Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., et al. (2021). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
54. Lyu, L., Yu, H., & Yang, Q. (2022). Threats to federated learning: A survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 110(5), 750–780.
55. Reddy, V. A. R. (2023). Orchestrating the Future Autonomous Healthcare Data Pipeline Management through Agentic AI Architectures. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science & Technology (IJARCST), 6(2), 7979-7992.
56. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., et al. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.
57. Kreuzberger, D., Kühl, N., & Hirschl, S. (2023). Machine learning operations (MLOps): Overview, definition, and architecture. IEEE Access, 11, 31866–31879.
58. Tamburri, D. A. (2022). Sustainable MLOps: Trends and challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems, 129, 144–156.
59. Kolla, S. K. (2023). Learning Health Systems Machine Intelligence for Clinical Prediction and Healthcare Optimization. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science & Technology (IJARCST), 6(2), 7955-7966.
60. Wazir, S., Kashyap, G. S., & Saxena, P. (2023). MLOps: A review. arXiv.
61. Fu, M., Pasuksmit, J., & Tantithamthavorn, C. (2024). AI for DevSecOps: A landscape and future opportunities. arXiv.
62. Debener, J., Heinke, V., & Kriebel, J. (2023). Detecting insurance fraud using supervised and unsupervised machine learning. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 90(3), 743–768.
63. Soni, H., Perla, S., Maddela, S., & Kumar, U. (2025, November). Generative AI in Cloud CRM: Securing Intelligent Workflows in Multi-Cloud Environments. In 2025 IEEE 3rd Global Conference on Wireless Computing and Networking (GCWCN) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
64. Tumminello, M., Consiglio, A., Vassallo, P., Cesari, R., & Farabullini, F. (2023). Insurance fraud detection: A statistically validated network approach. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 90(2), 381–419.
65. Lu, J., Lin, K., Chen, R., Lin, M., Chen, X., & Lu, P. (2023). Health insurance fraud detection by using an attributed heterogeneous information network with a hierarchical attention mechanism. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23, 62.
66. Reddy, V. A. R., & Kolla, S. K. (1984). Infrastructure-As-Code Practices For Regulated Healthcare Cloud Environments. Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, 30 (4), 1028–1042.
67. OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. arXiv.
68. Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., et al. (2023). LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv.
69. Team Gemini. (2024). Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv.
70. Jiang, A. Q., Sablayrolles, A., Mensch, A., et al. (2023). Mistral 7B. arXiv.
71. Bai, J., Bai, S., Chu, Y., et al. (2023). Qwen technical report. arXiv.
72. Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., et al. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv.
73. Chowdhery, A., Narang, S., Devlin, J., et al. (2022). PaLM: Scaling language modeling with pathways. arXiv.
74. Davuluri, P. N. AI-Augmented Sanctions Screening: Enhancing Accuracy and Latency in Real Time Compliance Systems.
75. Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., et al. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 24824–24837.
76. Lyu, L., Yu, H., & Yang, Q. (2022). Threats to federated learning: A survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 110(5), 750–780.
77. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., et al. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.
78. Breck, E., Cai, S., Nielsen, E., Salib, M., & Sculley, D. (2021). The ML test score: A rubric for ML production readiness and technical debt reduction. IEEE International Conference on Big Data.
79. Kolla, S. H. (2024). Retrieval-Augmented Enterprise Intelligence: Enhancing Accuracy, Trust, and Operational Decision-Making. International Journal of Future Innovative Science and Technology (IJFIST), 7(2), 12425.
80. Awosika, T., Shukla, R. M., & Pranggono, B. (2023). Transparency and privacy: The role of explainable AI and federated learning in financial fraud detection. arXiv.
81. Papasavva, A., Johnson, S., Lowther, E., Lundrigan, S., Mariconti, E., Markovska, A., & Tuptuk, N. (2024). Application of AI-based models for online fraud detection and analysis. arXiv.
82. Bandi, V. D. V. K. (2023). MLOps frameworks for reliable model deployment in cloud data platforms. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, 3(1), 84-101.
83. Banulescu-Radu, D., Cénac, P., Farabullini, F., & Vassallo, P. (2024). Practical guideline to efficiently detect insurance fraud in the era of machine learning: A household insurance case. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 91(4), 867–913.
84. Zhang, R., Cheng, D., Yang, J., Ouyang, Y., Wu, X., Zheng, Y., & Jiang, C. (2024). Pre-trained online contrastive learning for insurance fraud detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38(20), 22511–22519.
85. Amistapuram, K. (2024). Smart Decision Support Systems For Dynamic Tax Policy Optimization Using Reinforcement Learning. Available at SSRN 6143426.
86. Mudigonda, S. S., Baruah, P. K., Kandala, P. K., Gupta, R. Y., Hegde, S. N., & Chebrolu, S. (2024). Using interpretable machine learning methods: An application to health insurance fraud detection. Society of Actuaries Research Report.
87. Fu, M., Pasuksmit, J., & Tantithamthavorn, C. (2024). AI for DevSecOps: A landscape and future opportunities. arXiv.
88. Debener, J., Heinke, V., & Kriebel, J. (2023). Detecting insurance fraud using supervised and unsupervised machine learning. Journal of Risk and Insurance.
89. Kolla, T. (2024). Graph Neural Networks for HCC Risk Adjustment and Interoperability. International Journal of Science, Research and Technology, 7(6), 13244-13255.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elena Petrova (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The American Online Journal of Science and Engineering (AOJSE) is an open-access journal, and all published articles are made freely available to readers worldwide under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license governs the use, sharing, adaptation, and distribution of all content published in AOJSE and is designed to promote the broadest possible dissemination and reuse of scholarly research.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
Under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, any user is free to share, copy, and redistribute the published material in any medium or format, and to adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original authors and source. The license cannot be revoked as long as the terms are followed.
When using or redistributing content published in AOJSE, users must provide proper attribution by citing the original authors' names, the article title, the journal name (AOJSE), the volume and issue number, the year of publication, and the DOI or URL of the article. Users must also indicate if any changes were made to the original work. Attribution must be provided in a reasonable manner but must not suggest that the authors or AOJSE endorse the user or their use of the material.
Author Rights and Copyright Retention
AOJSE respects and upholds the intellectual property rights of all contributing authors. Authors who publish in AOJSE retain full copyright over their work. By submitting a manuscript to AOJSE, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to publish, reproduce, distribute, publicly display, and archive the article in print and electronic formats. This license allows AOJSE to make the article freely accessible to readers globally while ensuring that the authors remain the rightful owners of their work.
Authors are permitted to deposit their published articles in institutional repositories, personal websites, academic networking platforms, and preprint servers, provided that the original publication in AOJSE is acknowledged and properly cited. Authors may also reuse their published content in subsequent works, presentations, teaching materials, and grant applications without requiring prior permission from the journal.
Third-Party Content
Authors are solely responsible for obtaining written permission to reproduce any third-party material, including figures, tables, images, data, or excerpts from other publications, included in their manuscript. Evidence of such permissions must be provided to the editorial office upon request. AOJSE does not assume any responsibility for copyright infringement arising from the unauthorized inclusion of third-party content in published articles.
Permitted Uses
Under the CC BY 4.0 license, the following uses of AOJSE published content are freely permitted without prior written permission from the journal or authors, provided that proper attribution is given. Users may read, download, print, and distribute articles for personal, educational, or research purposes. Researchers may reuse data, figures, and findings for meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and secondary research. Educators may incorporate published articles into course materials, syllabi, and academic presentations. Journalists, policymakers, and practitioners may reference and cite published findings for professional and public interest purposes.
Prohibited Uses
While the CC BY 4.0 license is broad and permissive, users may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Users may not misrepresent the original authorship of published content or imply endorsement by the original authors or AOJSE without explicit consent. Plagiarism, data fabrication, and any form of academic misconduct in the reuse of published material are strictly prohibited and are a violation of publication ethics standards.
Institutional and Repository Deposit Policy
AOJSE fully supports self-archiving and green open access. Authors are encouraged to deposit the final published version of their article, also known as the version of record, in institutional repositories, subject repositories, and open-access databases immediately upon publication. There is no embargo period. Authors should always link back to the original article on the AOJSE website and include the full citation and DOI when depositing their work in any repository.
Digital Preservation and Archiving
AOJSE is committed to the long-term digital preservation of all published content to ensure its permanent availability and accessibility. The journal utilizes the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform, which supports internationally recognized digital archiving standards. AOJSE encourages participation in archiving networks such as LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) and CLOCKSS (Controlled LOCKSS) to safeguard published articles against data loss and ensure continued access for future generations of researchers and readers.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in articles published in AOJSE are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position, policy, or views of the journal, its editorial board, or its affiliated organizations. AOJSE makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and integrity of published content but does not accept legal responsibility for any errors, omissions, or claims arising from the use of information published in the journal.
Contact for Licensing Inquiries
For any questions regarding the licensing terms, copyright, or permitted use of content published in AOJSE, please contact the editorial office through the journal website at https://aojse.org. The editorial team will be happy to assist authors, readers, and institutions with any licensing-related queries.