Self-Healing AI Pipelines for Real-Time Financial Integration in Cloud-Native Systems

Authors

  • Abhishek Author
  • Luca Romano Author

Keywords:

AI-Enabled DevOps, AI Governance Frameworks, Continuous Compliance for AI, Risk Management in AI Systems, Cloud-Native AI Pipelines, AI Model Lifecycle Management, MLOps and DevOps Integration, CI/CD for AI Systems, Self-Governing AI Pipelines, Financial Systems Integration, SaaS Ontology-Based Development, No-Code AI Development, AI Deployment Automation, DevOps Toolchains for AI, AI Operational Resilience, Responsible AI Practices, AI Risk Mitigation Strategies, Enterprise AI Integration, Intelligent Automation Pipelines, AI Engineering Practices.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled capabilities revolutionize today’s businesses and lead to the creation of numerous AI-powered services. Consequently, organizations also seek practical ways to integrate AI technologies into their operations. AI models must be constantly and rigorously governed to ensure continuous compliance, mitigate risks, and avoid excessive business disruptions. Several AI-powered services have been deployed worldwide, enhancing many of them, especially financial ones. Yet, it is challenging to build and deploy a DevOps pipeline for AI-powered services in a completely automated and self-governing manner—mainly due to lack of software development resources with adequate profiles, asymmetries with high-cloud-native areas supporting AI modeling, and the urgency of crisis-sensitive environments demanding immediate responses.

Building and running AI-powered DevOps pipelines for financial system integration in cloud-native environments can benefit from practical operational advice covering human, technology, and process aspects. The areas to address derive from practical evidence obtained during the development of a reference architecture and empirical case studies that experimented with a SaaS ontology to develop complex systems in a strictly no-code way. The logic behind them stems from operations absorbed in other models, but applied back to TF-DevOps. The guidance explores the necessary talent profile—essentially, individuals in control—technology, toolchains, standards, and techniques with sufficient coverage to ameliorate the inherent CI/CD asymmetries. It can be used to complement and assess industry literature on AI-powered DevOps implementations.

References

1. Brogi, A., Carrasco, J., Durán, F., Pimentel, E., & Soldani, J. (2022). Self-healing trans-cloud applications. Computing, 104, 809–833.

2. Wu, H., Zhihao, S., Peng, G., & Wolter, K. (2020). A reactive batching strategy of Apache Kafka for reliable stream processing in real-time. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering.

3. Iglesias Vázquez, F., Hartl, A., Zseby, T., & Zimek, A. (2023). Anomaly detection in streaming data: A comparison and evaluation study. Expert Systems with Applications, 233, Article 120994.

4. Sharma, C. K., Gorle, R., Mangala, N., Jindal, A., J, A., & Sundram, S. (2026). Blockchain-Based Human Resource Management System for Transparent Workforce Governance. In 2026 7th International Conference On Computational Vision and Bio Inspired Computing (ICCVBIC) (pp. 1741–1745). IEEE. 2026 7th International Conference On Computational Vision and Bio Inspired Computing (ICCVBIC). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccvbic71195.2026.11689175

5. Basheer, M. Y. I., Mohd Ali, A., Abdul Hamid, N. H., Ariffin, M. A. M., Osman, R., Nordin, S., & Gu, X. (2024). Autonomous anomaly detection for streaming data. Knowledge-Based Systems, 284, Article 111235.

6. Leveni, F., Cassales, G. W., Pfahringer, B., Bifet, A., & Boracchi, G. (2024). Online isolation forest. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 235, pp. 27288–27298).

7. Ko, J., & Comuzzi, M. (2022). Keeping our rivers clean: Information-theoretic online anomaly detection for streaming business process events. Information Systems, 104, Article 101894.

8. Movva, V. R., & Pareek, P. K. (2026). Multi-Agent AI Architecture for Autonomous Retail Operations: Coordinating Intelligent Agents Across Cloud, DevOps, and Enterprise Platform. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 18(23s), 925-932.

9. Eragamreddy, R. R. (2024). Designing self-healing microservices in cloud-native architectures. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 13(6).

10. Mishra, A. (2025). Self-healing infrastructure in CI/CD pipelines: Automating resilience in cloud-native applications. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(7), 889–897.

11. Mangalampalli, B. M., Peddi, R. K., Kolla, S. K., Reddy, V. A. R., Mangala, N., & Seenu, A. (2026, June). Explainable Clinical Graph Intelligence Framework for Longitudinal Risk Modeling and Care Pathway Optimization. In 2026 Third International Conference on Innovations in Cybersecurity and Data Science (ICICDS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

12. Shevchenko, O. (2025). Towards self-healing cloud infrastructure: Automated recovery methods and their effectiveness. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(6), 96–101.

13. Leveni, F., Cassales, G. W., Pfahringer, B., Bifet, A., & Boracchi, G. (2024). Online isolation forest. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 235, 27288–27298.

14. Vakkalagadda, T., & Pareek, P. K. (2026). Self-Learning Artificial Intelligence Platforms for Autonomous Financial Risk Management. International Journal of Special Education, 41(15s), 238-254.

15. Wu, H., Zhihao, S., Peng, G., & Wolter, K. (2020). A reactive batching strategy of Apache Kafka for reliable stream processing in real-time. In 2020 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE).

16. Iglesias Vázquez, F., Hartl, A., Zseby, T., & Zimek, A. (2023). Anomaly detection in streaming data: A comparison and evaluation study. Expert Systems with Applications, 233, Article 120994.

17. Penaka, B. (2026). AUTONOMOUS MULTI-AGENT AI FRAMEWORK FOR END-TO-END CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT AND CARE COORDINATION. Genetics and Molecular Research.

18. Basheer, M. Y. I., Mohd Ali, A., Abdul Hamid, N. H., Ariffin, M. A. M., Osman, R., Nordin, S., & Gu, X. (2024). Autonomous anomaly detection for streaming data. Knowledge-Based Systems, 284, Article 111235.

19. Ko, J., & Comuzzi, M. (2022). Keeping our rivers clean: Information-theoretic online anomaly detection for streaming business process events. Information Systems, 104, Article 101894.

20. Sukumar, S., Kumar, S., Yandamuri, U. S., & KV, M. N. (2026). Business Ethics and Corporate Sustainability. BR Publications.

21. Leveni, F., Cassales, G. W., Pfahringer, B., Bifet, A., & Boracchi, G. (2024). Online isolation forest. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 27288–27298).

22. Brogi, A., Carrasco, J., Durán, F., Pimentel, E., & Soldani, J. (2022). Self-healing trans-cloud applications. Computing, 104, 809–833.

23. Wu, H., Zhihao, S., Peng, G., & Wolter, K. (2020). A reactive batching strategy of Apache Kafka for reliable stream processing in real-time. In Proceedings of the IEEE 31st International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering.

24. Arunakumari, M., Mattaparthi, R., Kothuri, S., Prakash, V. D., & Prasad, E. S. (2026, July). Data-Driven Framework for Real-Time Carbon Accounting and Sustainability Monitoring in Off-Grid Urban Residential Microgrids. In 2026 14th International Conference on Smart Grid (icSmartGrid) (pp. 493-500). IEEE.

25. Iglesias Vázquez, F., Hartl, A., Zseby, T., & Zimek, A. (2023). Anomaly detection in streaming data: A comparison and evaluation study. Expert Systems with Applications, 233, Article 120994.

26. Basheer, M. Y. I., Mohd Ali, A., Abdul Hamid, N. H., Ariffin, M. A. M., Osman, R., Nordin, S., & Gu, X. (2024). Autonomous anomaly detection for streaming data. Knowledge-Based Systems, 284, Article 111235.

27. Suprith, M., Davuluri, P. N., Paramasamy, S., Yandamuri, U. S., & Motamary, S. (2026, June). AI-Enabled Business Process Reengineering for Agile and Data-Driven Organizations. In 2026 5th OPJU International Technology Conference (OTCON) on Smart Computing for Innovation and Advancement in Industry 5.0 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

28. Ko, J., & Comuzzi, M. (2022). Keeping our rivers clean: Information-theoretic online anomaly detection for streaming business process events. Information Systems, 104, Article 101894.

29. Leveni, F., Cassales, G. W., Pfahringer, B., Bifet, A., & Boracchi, G. (2024). Online isolation forest. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 235, 27288–27298.

30. Bandi, V. D. V. K. Autonomous Data Platforms: Converging AI, MLOps, and Cloud Engineering for Digital.

31. Eragamreddy, R. R. (2024). Designing self-healing microservices in cloud-native architectures. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 13(6).

32. Mishra, A. (2025). Self-healing infrastructure in CI/CD pipelines: Automating resilience in cloud-native applications. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(7), 889–897.

33. Mahadevan, S. (2026). Governed Serverless Automation Ecosystem for AI-Driven Enterprise Integration and Sustainable Cloud Operations. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 18(16s), 1561-1570.

34. Shevchenko, O. (2025). Towards self-healing cloud infrastructure: Automated recovery methods and their effectiveness. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(6), 96–101.

35. Wu, H., Zhihao, S., Peng, G., & Wolter, K. (2020). A reactive batching strategy of Apache Kafka for reliable stream processing in real-time. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering.

36. Brogi, A., Carrasco, J., Durán, F., Pimentel, E., & Soldani, J. (2022). Self-healing trans-cloud applications. Computing, 104, 809–833.

37. Lakhanpal, S., Tunjungsari, H. K., Raj, S., Chukka, A., Dawadi, D., & Mangalampalli, B. M. (2026, April). The Digital Transformation of Healthcare: Balancing Opportunities, Risks, and Ethical Considerations. In 2026 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Innovations For Smart & Sustainable Future (MISSF) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

38. Iglesias Vázquez, F., Hartl, A., Zseby, T., & Zimek, A. (2023). Anomaly detection in streaming data: A comparison and evaluation study. Expert Systems with Applications, 233, Article 120994.

39. Basheer, M. Y. I., Mohd Ali, A., Abdul Hamid, N. H., Ariffin, M. A. M., Osman, R., Nordin, S., & Gu, X. (2024). Autonomous anomaly detection for streaming data. Knowledge-Based Systems, 284, Article 111235.

40. Potturi, P. (2026). Agentic Business Intelligence Architecture for Autonomous Data Exploration, Insight Generation, and Strategic Decision Orchestration. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 18(22s), 536-542.

41. Ko, J., & Comuzzi, M. (2022). Keeping our rivers clean: Information-theoretic online anomaly detection for streaming business process events. Information Systems, 104, Article 101894.

42. Leveni, F., Cassales, G. W., Pfahringer, B., Bifet, A., & Boracchi, G. (2024). Online isolation forest. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 235, pp. 27288–27298).

Additional Files

Published

2026-08-23

How to Cite

Self-Healing AI Pipelines for Real-Time Financial Integration in Cloud-Native Systems. (2026). The American Online Journal of Science and Engineering (AOJSE), 4(03). https://aojse.org/index.php/aojse/article/view/79

Similar Articles

1-10 of 78

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.